Header-Logo Ultraorange.net

America’s next Top Male: the homegrown Preacher or the foreign Negro?

wa_huckabee_or_obama

As a non-American one has to follow US politics closely - because anything these people vote for has serious - and I really mean serious - consequences for the rest of the world.

Thanks to MSNBC’s live stream I was able to watch the whole drama unfold last night (thanks to MSNBC for being so kind and allowing foreigner to watch their video as well - many American media outlets block foreigners).

Overall I am not the least bit surprised about the current state of affairs - and the obvious conclusions. (I know that this is only the first state of over 50 to cast their votes.)

America’s so called conservatives haven’t learned a bit from the dreadful Bush experience - nor have the Democrats.

wa_us_elections_sheep

Where is our next Christian Preehehehesident?!

Once again the born again citizens have pushed the next professional Christians to the top. Huckabee came out as the top dog followed by the equally christy Romney. Once again the religious affiliation reigns superior. The sheep demand a Shepard.

The Bush White House has hardly delivered any of the goods the evangelicals wanted, he didn’t fight poverty, nor did he overturn unpopular abortion laws. But still these religious people believe another one of ‘them’ will fix it this time.

On the Democrat’s side the picture is equally bleak. I consider Obama as the ultimate liberal excuse and fantasy: he is young like Kennedy and represents the biggest black icon Martin Luther King. This is a terrible addiction to symbols of the past, because neither Kennedy nor King did ‘finish’ their projects. And they both had some serious political deficits.

A small sidenote: I find it really strange that most popular Democratic icons (Clinton, Kennedy & King) are womanizers.

wa_us_election_kennedy

He is dead - get over it Democrats.

So America’s voters are still addicted to the same old qualities that make no sense in politics at all: likeability and electability.

Once again they are looking for a person that everybody likes - once again the search for the beer buddy. (Remember when they sold Bush to Americans as the presidential candidate you want to have a drink with?).

Electability is even worse. It just means finding a person that looks presidential enough to be elected. It does NOT mean finding the person who is best suited for the job.

Description=WAS97:NEW YORK,3MAR97 - New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani attends New York's "Inner Circle" dinner March 1 dressed as Marilyn Monroe. Giuiliani came in for the finale of the $400 -a- plate black tie affair at the New York Hilton and performed a reprise of Monroe's famous song to President John F. Kennedy, "Happy Birthday, Mr. President." (NEW YORK POINTS OUT; NO MAGS; NO SALES) cm/New York Daily News Photo by Joe DiMaria REUTERS

Go for the transvestite: President and First Lady in one person!

That is why experienced leaders like John McCain, Joe Biden and to a certain degree Hillary Clinton did so badly in the polls. Also the analyses of the voter’s decision process shows that they give a shit about political experience and good (international) network to make things happen.

They want change - whatever that is to them.

Apart from unelectable ‘weirdos’ like Ron Paul and Denis Kucinich none of the candidates have shown any solid ideas or visions - nor commitment - for true change - just more of the same.

All that talk about health care and getting out of Iraq is just that - cheap talk. None of them really touched farm subsidies, a REAL energy policy, a reduction of military spending and a working solution for immigration. Not to speak of breaking up big media, a real reform of the educational system, etc. …

Overall America is still entrenched in it’s ignorant ways: it’s voters as much as it’s politicians. It doesn’t matter if the president will be Hillary, Obama, Romney or Huckabee - the military industrial complex will grind on without mercy. American troops will still be in Iraq in 2010, Americans will continue to guzzle oil in huge amount and the decline of the country will take up even more speed.

A new President will just change the face of Americanism - and maybe a Democrat will do some ’stuff’ to soften the social and economic pressure on Americans, but the system itself will be  untouched. And most of the draconian laws and limited civil liberties will stay in place.

orangeguru (01-04 19:35) | 4 Comments | Permalink
The Truth about Democracy by Bettany Hughes

Documentary / each ca. 50 minutes

Another great historical documentary by Bettany Hughes. I think this should be mandatory in each school in democratic countries to serve as education and a warning to all future generations.

orangeguru (01-02 18:06) | No Comments | Permalink
Jacques-Louis David - The Death of Socrates 1787

art_Jacques-Louis David - The Death of Socrates

Socrates death was a tragic loss for Athenian culture - and still stands as a grave warning to all Democracies around the world: don’t kill your intellectuals, just because you don’t understand or appreciate them telling you the truth.

1. Click player below to start the music.

2. Click the image above to dive into the art.

3. Study for four minutes this great piece of art.

Athens just started it’s decline - it had lost the Peloponnesian War against Sparta. Socrates himself had fought for Athens and was a loyal patriot. But he also challenged the status quo of it’s society and wanted more progress. His ’smartass’ questions made the citizens of Athens more and more uneasy.

Plus Socrates had a large following of younger man and often met with them in more or less secret places to discuss their ideas. It didn’t help that some of Socrates biggest followers Alcibiades had betrayed Athens during the war with Sparta. So it was suggested that Socrates was corrupting Athens’ youth and he should therefore be punished. And Socrates challenged the religious believes of his times.

His trial was a huge event - he was judged by 500 of his fellow citizens. Socrates stuck to the truth, even mocked the jury and all the accusations instead of playing ‘nice’ and begging for mercy. He was found guilty 280 to 220. But he was still defiant. When his punishment was discussed he himself suggested being threat like an Olympic winner and given free meals (which was a great insult). So his death sentence had an even greater majority 360 to 140.

His execution was a sad affair - he refused to flee the city or take any chance to redeem himself.

We have seen the prosecution of smart wise man again and again in all cultures by kings, priests and mobs alike. Democracy is not a protection against acts of stupidity and uneducated destruction of brain power.

The curse of any great thinker will always be that his fellow citizens will be far behind him. The great publicity and admiration people like Einstein, Freud or Oppenheimer in their days was and is very unusual. Today’s bighead like Noam Chomsky and Richard Dawkins face very hostile opposition and ignorance. Once again the citizens of democratic states don’t like to be asked simple questions or have their religion challenged by ‘thinkers’ …

More? Jacques-Louis David @ Wikipedia and Socrates @ Wikipedia

orangeguru (12-25 5:29) | 2 Comments | Permalink
Russia votes

RUSSIA-VOTE/

RUSSIA-VOTE/

RUSSIA-VOTE

BBC News: Russians vote in general election  

An election of superlatives: 11 time zones, 107 million voters, 95.000 voting stations, 300 international observers, 450.000 policeman ‘guarding’ the elections, eleven parties to choose from and one clear winner already - Putin.

Russia’s power elites and oligarch have the country firm in their grip. There is no free press, there is no choice and there is no democratic exchange.

A sad day for Democracy!

orangeguru (12-02 17:48) | 1 Comment | Permalink
Australia goes left

wa_vote_in_australia

After 11 years of conservative rule Australia makes a jump to the left (details here). Labor promised to sign the Kyoto treaty, get the troops out of Iraq (but hopefully still support the war in Afghanistan) and rolling bad some labor laws which favored the bosses.

I hope for all my Oz friends that the new government REALLY does something about the environment - even when it will decades until nature will react to any human efforts. Australia suffers tremendously from one heat wave after another, the wildlife and the great reefs are greatly endangered and have already taken a lot of damage.

But this election also influences the world stage: George Bush has now lost most of his Coalition of the Willing. Spain went left, Italy went left, Australia went left. Germany’s Frau Merkel is not very willing either nor is Britain’s Gordon Brown. Only France’s Sarkozy seems pretty excited about following America into a new war.

orangeguru (11-24 23:14) | 2 Comments | Permalink
Canada’s currently riding high on positive War Propaganda

wa_decal_-_Canadian_Forces

While the US Americans have a hard time finding second class recruits, Canada’s armed forces get almost more applications they can handle.

The War on Terror (mostly the mission in Afghanistan) and many PR events in Canada have been spun into a very brave and positive image. Young Canadians love it and flock to the military.

But the weak Canadian politicians dislike the popularity of the military - something new and weird to the highly democratic and peace loving Canadians. But it’s also a world wide campaign - mostly via the web: Combat Camera and their own YouTube channel.

Canada and it’s dedication to help out in Afghanistan could be a new role model for most western humanitarian war efforts. Countries like Germany still have an awkward relationship with their military forces, America’s PR with embedded journalists has worked during the beginnings of the Afghanistan and Iraq war, but later was mostly despised as pure propaganda.

Democratic countries need to communicate and discuss their military endeavors. It needs to be more than ‘Support our troops’ stickers, but good financing and a good understanding of the voter why industrial nations still need well equipped and trained armed forces.

For the Canadian Military their own good PR lead to better financing and therefore combat readiness for their current missions - which is a good thing. But it should never lead to an unhealthy relationship like the military-industrial-complex in the US.

orangeguru (11-20 5:27) | No Comments | Permalink
Why Democracy - an excellent BBC political documentary

tv_why_democracy_Please_Vote_

tv_Why_Democracy_logo

42-16203824

tv_why_democracy_dinner_with_the_president

I love the BBC. They always produce challenging series and try to support public education and discussion. I can’t add much to what the website has to say about itself and the project:

Democracy is arguably the greatest political buzzword of our time and is invoked by everyone - but what does it mean? Can it be defined, measured, safeguarded? Can it be sold, bought, and transplanted? Can it grow? Can it die? What does it mean to people who can’t even talk about it? What does it mean to people who don’t believe in it? What does it mean to you?

In October 2007, ten one-hour films focused on contemporary democracy will be broadcast in the world’s largest ever factual media event. More than 40 broadcasters on all continents are participating, with an estimated audience of 300 million viewers. Each of the broadcasters - an A-Z which includes everyone from Al Arabiya to ZDF - will be producing a locally-based seasons of film, radio, debate and discussion to tie in with the global broadcast of the Why Democracy? films.

The films are made by independent award-winning filmmakers from around the world, including China, India, Japan, Liberia, USA, Bolivia, Denmark, Afghanistan, Egypt, Pakistan and Russia. With subjects ranging from US torture methods to the election of a class monitor in a Chinese primary school to the Danish Cartoons scandal, the films take a wide-ranging and in-depth look at the world we live in today.

That’s not all. We are creating 20 thought-provoking short films, dealing with personal, political and rights issues around the theme ‘What does democracy mean to me?’  These films will be available to view on whydemocracy.net.

Please take some time to watch all ten episodes online. Highly recommended. And it provides you with insights you hardly find in most of the mainstream media (reports).

More? Official Homepage

orangeguru (11-13 21:04) | No Comments | Permalink
Why we fight

tv_why_we_fight_poster

An excellent movie about America’s lust for weapons and power. Watch the trailer online or simply the whole movie.

This movie makes an excellent addition to the ‘Fog of War‘, but not so intellectual and focus on a single person (Robert McNamara) - and it gives you a much better oversight how it all developed.

orangeguru (11-07 20:41) | No Comments | Permalink
The Defenders of Absolutism

wa_the_defenders_of_the_leader

I am making here a little fun of the historical concept of Absolutism.

One of the major underlying difference between so called left/liberal and right/conservative (plus fundamentalist) dogmas is the conflict between ‘relativism’ and ‘absolutism’.

In a dogma of absolutism you have ‘true’ and solid values and ‘points’ in your world view that are not negotiable. (Wikipedia on political and moral absolutism.) Some of it’s heads are: Thomas Hobbes, Immanuel Kant and Aristotle.

With a relativistic world one thing leads to another, you hardly find solid positions to navigate, but a mere set of ideas that keep a network of borders that constantly shift. (Wikipedia on moral relativism.) Some of it’s heads are: Karl Marx, Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heidegger.

Absolute concepts and values are of course easier to understand and present, since their set of rules is less wobbly - hence the word absolute.

wa_karl_marx_portrait

Karl Marx - bloody relativist communist scummmmm …

Here are some statements about Absolutism by Mr. Richard Hooker (taken again from here):

Political philosophers attempted to extricate themselves from these matters through two different, contradictory approaches: “natural law” or “the Divine Right of Kings.” According to natural law political thinkers, there were immutable natural laws which should govern states and their relations to their citizens and to other states. According to the doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, a system of thought derived ultimately from medieval theories of kingship, certain kings ruled because they were specifically chosen by God to be kings. Surprisingly, both of these approaches could yield the same result: the idea that the best form of government is an autocracy, or rule by a single person. This person was not to be questioned or disobeyed; this became known as “absolutism,” since the monarch ruled with “absolute” power, that is, unshared power.

Natural law yielded absolutism in the work of Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who believed all things, including human society, could be understood using principles of geometry. Hobbes’ central argument was that all humans are driven by two and only two impulses: fear of death and desire for power. If left unchecked, human beings would act on these impulses and live violent, brutish, inhumane, and solitary lives. In order to keep these impulses in check, human beings, according to Hobbes, drew up a social contract, which ceded authority to a single person in exchange for a level of security. The single ruler would control the violent and selfish impulses of individual members in a society through brute force; individuals would lose their liberty, but they would gain security and community. Hobbes didn’t care what form this single rule might take, whether a monarch or a dictator, only that absolute power was required to keep society together.

wa_black_male_on_electric_chair

Relative guilty? Absolute Guilty? Relative dead? Absolute dead?

This is of course a nasty rhetoric trick from my side, to mix modern conservative thinking with an 17th century ideology. But I can’t help the feeling that the overall attitude is very similar?!

But it is about time that we leave dogmas behind us as political tools and aspire to use whatever is the best idea for the problem. But that would again imply that that solutions are relative to the problem and it’s circumstances. So is life in the end relative and not absolute? Can one defend absolute ideas in the end? Read this christian refutation of Relativism.

orangeguru (11-03 19:51) | 2 Comments | Permalink
Protective Stupidity

wa_protective_stupidty

Crooks & Liars has made this great comment about 1984 and the right wing blogosphere:

A Party member…is supposed to live in a continuous frenzy of hatred of foreign enemies and internal traitors, triumph over victories, and self-abasement before the power and wisdom of the Party. The discontents produced by his bare, unsatisfying life are deliberately turned outwards and dissipated by such devices as the Two Minutes Hate, and the speculations which might possibly induce a sceptical or rebellious attitude are killed in advance by his early acquired inner discipline…called, in Newspeak, crimestop. Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.

I love the expression protective stupidity - it’s much better than the usual label of ‘ignorance’. It’s not ignorance to stop thinking - it really is protective stupidity.

orangeguru (10-31 18:49) | No Comments | Permalink
A public service announcement to all Anti-Globalization Protesters

wa_alternative_protestors_streetsfighters

The modern Anti-G8, Anti-WTO and Anti-Globalization movement is very mobile and well organized. These people travel all over the world to make their voices heard. Excellent!

May I suggest to you to fly to Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe next? These countries could use some real democratic protests and stone throwing. Make these governments realize their mistakes! The tickets are hardly more expensive then flying from London to Seattle or Genoa. I know you guys like to travel - I understand it’s for a good cause. Stone throwing is eco friendly, since it’s a sustainable form of violence. Stones get recycled.

wa_saudi_woman_shopping

A Saudi women - she can’t leave the house without a male, she can’t vote and she certainly can’t protest like you.

Saudi Arabia is still the richest and the most oppressive regime on this planet. Women’s rights are almost nonexistent. Saudi Arabia’s money supports terrorism all over the world. Saudi Arabian oils fuels global pollution. Plus Saudi Arabia sponsored terrorism - terrorism breeds war and causes even more waste of oil, dropped landmine’s …

Zimbabwe - or better say Mr Mugabe - basically plays the same stupid game like Mao/Stalin, trying to force his ideas onto a nation. But all he created is poverty and hunger on a grand scale. He could use some ‘green’ advice on how to build a functioning agricultural state. Why don’t you help your brothers and sisters down there with some protest advice and try to start a revolution there?

wa_China_air_Pollution_small

This is a HUGE smog cloud over China - any western protesters going there?

China - now there we have a colossal eco killer. The sky over China is so polluted you can see it in satellite pictures. According to the WHO about 100.000 Chinese citizens die from pollution each year. China’s industry could certainly use a lot of ‘green’ advice how to built an eco friendly industry and agriculture. Plus China is buying loads of assets in Africa - securing it’s share of resources - and they don’t care about any politics or human rights. They sell weapons whoever wants them and has something to trade.

So - next stop China, Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe? I also recommend visits to Iran and North Korea.

orangeguru (10-15 16:44) | No Comments | Permalink
Chinese Communists: We don’t need your stinking Democracy

wa_chinese-Communist-congress-0

BBC News: China rules out West’s democracy
BBC News: How China is ruled (excellent background information)

Currently one of the most important political meetings takes place in Peking: the Communist Party’s 17th congress. Here China’s future is discussed and decided by over 2000 delegates from all corners of the red empire. The goal is to build a ‘Building Harmonious Society‘ - whatever that means.

At the moment the workers state is a workers nightmare: no union protection, hardly any enforced labor laws, rampant capitalism, no working health insurance or pension systems. All blown away by the capitalist revolution of the last 30 years.

wa_chinese-Communist-congress-1

Nice national harmonious firewall comrade.

President Hu made the usual nice speech - but basically all stays the same: the communist party has a total stranglehold on power, the military enforces their rule, the new oligarchs bring in the money and China plays nice with all countries who own any kind of resources for the future.

And yes, dissenting voice and any form of opposition is still brutally suppressed. Escpecially for the Olympic Games - any form of protest would disturb the fairy tale the Chinese leaders live in.

More? Propaganda 1 and Propaganda 2

orangeguru (10-14 23:44) | No Comments | Permalink
A funny thing happened on the Way to Democracy

historica_ballot-box

Every time I hear a modern politician emphasize the need to democratize the backwards nations on this planet I want to applaud and punch them in the face at the same time. This also applies to many political commentators and of course Bloggers, who love to pounce undemocratic countries and make them switch to the best political system invented yet by sheer willpower.

Although I am a staunch supporter of Democracy, I don’t believe in it as an instant solution to most countries problems. Democracy is an indicator for a modern and developed nation - but Democracy itself doesn’t transform backwards societies into shiny new ones.

Europe has not only invented many forms of government - but also tried and tested many of them. It’s a rich tradition paid for with many life’s and often centuries of terrible consequences. Most of all it took Europe nearly two thousand long years to transform itself into these shining beacons of enlightenment and peace as we know it today.

historica_Stoa_of_Attalos

Aristotle’s Politics at work in Greece.

But the History of Democracy itself is a funny and ugly affair - with a huge whole between it’s beginning and final modern success.

Although it was so famously invented by the Greek nation states (most notably Athens) around 500 BC. But it was not the form of democracy we hold so dear today: woman, slaves and bloody foreigners were excluded from the process and of course regarded as second class citizens. Most important of all is that Demokratia was in the beginning successfully exported to some other nation states, but pretty fast abolished through other forms of government. Here is another good background article on Greek Democracy.

A similar development happened to the Roman Republic - which freed itself from it’s kings around the same time as the Greeks discussed in public meetings. The Roman Republic also had many elements of a modern state: a senate with lively debates, a citizenship, rule of law, votes and elected officials.

Greece lost it’s independence to the Romans around 150 BC - Rome itself turned slowly into a dictatorship after many bloody civil wars and chaotic rule by the Senate. This transformation found it’s great dictator with Julius Ceasar.

historica_early_senate

A republican Senate is boring - lets get ourselves a proper Dictator

Now comes the funny thing - since the end of the Greece and roman experiments not much was heard or seen of Democracy in Europe. Some tribal societies had smaller democratic elections or forms of community (like the Althing in Iceland - established 930 or the polish Veche), but no big democratic state or system emerged for a long time.

Also the idea of Democracy was more or less forgotten by European thinkers and statesmen. The medieval mind was more occupied with symbolism and religion then democracy or equal rights for everyone. Now it was time for feudalism and religion to bring blood, tears and ignorance. The common men lost any chance in participating in ‘big government’.

For almost 1500 years until the Renaissance nobody had any real interest in old Greek ideas and values. Rich merchants, the clergy and feudal ruler continued to suppress peasants and workers. Even the Reformation didn’t change much about this. Martin Luther supported the ruling class during several peasant uprisings. It was not yet time for social equality nor democratic rights for everyone.

historica_oliver_cromwell

May I have your head your Majesty?

But all was not lost - especially in England. The first Parliament (later split up into the House of Commons and House of Lords) was formed during the reign of King Henry III in the 13th century. Still not mass democracy, but a start to sharing powers and establishing the modern rule of law.

It was still a feudal affair, a political class system instead of a system of democratic equals. And still the Crown ruled supreme. It was a long and bitter process over many centuries and civil wars to change this.

Almost 500 years later Oliver Cromwell made the Parliament a permanent establishment instead of a ’seasonal affair’ created and disbanded by the Crown at will. Now the people reigned supreme instead of the Monarchy - but it took two bloody civil wars to cut of the monarch’s head (1649) and establish the Parliamentary System in England.

historica_american_declaration_independence

What say ye old wooden tooth?

The biggest step for European Democracy happened in … America and their fight for Independence from the British Empire (1775 - 1783). The American Revolution started with the impressive Declaration of Independence in the year 1776.

This great document was the ‘result’ of the European ‘Age of Enlightenment’ - a political, artistic and philosophical movement that created the mental cornerstones of our modern societies with it’s humanism, socialism, secular and democratic systems. But it was the achievement of young American society to build the first nation based on these ideas. It was much harder to transform the old and encrusted European societies - but it happened eventually.

Now we have to applaud the french people who finally got it right and started their first revolution of 1789, which lead finally to the Abolition of Feudalism.

historica_house_of_commons_1851

The modern House of Commons from 1851.

It still took almost two hundred more years since Cromwell till Democracy was more firmly established in the UK by the Reform Act of 1867, which allowed more ‘normal’ men to vote instead of the privileged gentry and it also abolished so called rotten boroughs. Still no women were allowed to vote.

The real reason for the breakthrough of modern western Democracy was the Industrial Revolution. With the emergence of the working and middle class the old class system was finally abolished and replaced by new modern movements. Socialism, Feminism and Communism were triggered by the social consequences of the Industrial Revolution.

historica_factory-workers

Say hello to a new political power - the industrial working class.

The miserable living and working conditions of workers in slums, child labor and the slow organization of Labor created the pressure for huge changes, like medical care, housing projects, education, equal rights and the vote for everyone. The new economy broke down many social barriers and also allowed a new upward mobility.

And finally the suffragette movement - started in the early 1800’s - established the right to vote for woman (1920 in the US and 1928 in the UK). Once again a slow process that took almost another hundred years to be globally accepted.

The new ‘mass societies’ also demanded better forms of representation and government - as well as accountability and social justice. The shock of the Soviet October Revolution finally convinced even the most hardened elites in Europe that mass democracy was the best way to go for the future.

historica_nazi_workers_rally

Democracies have to be protected against the enemy from within

But modern Democracy faced two final test before it got the global stamp of approval: it had to fight to defend it’s values against Fascism and Communism before it was accepted as the best form of government. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Moussolini and Franco transformed their nations by popular support into terrible societies.

So it was a long and bloody road from the first forms of Democracy until our modern mass Democracies. To establish itself Democracy needs first the rule of law and a broad industrial society with a rule of law and separation of powers.

Without economic support to pay for education, medical care and a national infrastructure it won’t work. You also need a big and strong middle class and educated elites to develop a political landscape, start parties, run ministries, the judiciary system, an independent media, ‘neutral’ police and armed forces. Too many Democracies fell victim to military interventions ‘to save the country’.

historica_we_elect_allah

We elect Allah as our Leader.

Equally important is a strong secular humanism within the society itself - the separation of Church and State. It took Europe centuries of war and millions of deaths to learn that lesson.

Many African or middle eastern countries lack many components I just mentioned and you can’t for example develop a strong economical base over night or an educated middle class to form a strong political landscape. The same is also still true for a few Asian countries, but they have picked up the basics much faster then many of their African and Arabic counterparts.

orangeguru (10-01 11:21) | No Comments | Permalink
Tyrannies still in Power

wa_old_tyrants_Fidel-Castro

Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz in power since 1959. Has led his country into isolation and missed the chance to open his society after the fall of communism in the late 1980’s. Although the US is also to blame for the decades of useless embargo it’s mostly Mr Castro’s fault that Cuba is such a miserable place.

wa_old_tyrants_robert_mugabe_waving

Robert Gabriel Mugabe running or better ruining his country since 1980. Great work! It has fallen from being Africa’s high ranking food producer to a starving and terribly poor country. He hunted down gays, disowned white farmers and wasted huge amounts of foreign aid with his cronies.

wa_old_tyrants_kim-jong-il

Kim Jong-il is since 1994 continuing his fathers work of starving and killing his own people. While neighboring South Korea and China have made huge progress his country spiraled downwards. But at least he became a world famous atomic bomb salesman and movie collector. Well done little man.

TL011195

Muammar al-Qaddafi - self proclaimed leader of Libya since 1969. Sponsored terror on his people and the west for decades. Although he finally succumbed to American pressure and military power his country is still in ruins. Economic reforms are badly needed although it is rich in oil. His family and cronies have a total grip on the country. The rule of his laws is harsh, there is no political culture nor any official working opposition.

wa_old_tyrants_abdullah

Abdullah bin Abdulaziz al-Saud current King of the House of Saud, which is running the richest and most depressive country in the world since 1744. The House of Saud teamed up with Wahhabism - an especially conservative brand of Islam to sanctify it’s hold on power. The country riches are mostly given to the huge royal family - according to Wikipedia around 25.000 people. The Saud tyranny and grip on power is supported by the US since 1945. Most islamic terrorism is funded with Saudi money as well as manpower. Osama bin Laden is the most prominent example. Saudi clerics are among the fiercest in the region and they can rely on the official religious police to see their rules empowered.

Did I miss anyone? I am not sure to include Iran, since it’s people to continue so much to oppress themselves. So I consider it more like a fascist state with changing players at the top. Suggestions welcomed! ;-)

orangeguru (09-29 17:25) | 7 Comments | Permalink
Another World War to unite us?

war_Franz_Ferdinand

Before 1914 the world was already starting a global society without any political systems to divide them.

Then Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria, was assassinated by a terrorist which started the first half of the great war from 1914 till 1945. It took half a century to restore the global society to the same flow of goods and people like before 1914. It took Europe another World War to finally start the European Union.

Are we now having a new global war thanks to 9/11? Instead of communism and capitalism will we have a competition between Islam Fundamentalism vs. Western Democratic Idealism?

Our global society is still very young and unstable - are these the wars to unite us? Is the horror of war the only way to break down national differences?

orangeguru (09-26 15:41) | No Comments | Permalink
More Guns = guarantees your civil liberties?

wa_assault_rifles

Hello gun nuts! have a look at Iraq to see what happens when everybody has a weapon and insists on defending his civil rights against others.

Separation of power is not only essential for the government - also for the people. You give away your (fire) power to settle disputes by civil, peaceful and legal ways.

Bullets don’t create democracy, the rule of law does.

orangeguru (09-24 19:27) | No Comments | Permalink
The difference between observing crime, preventing and solving it

wa_CCTV_security

Evening Standard UK: Tens of thousands of CCTV cameras, yet 80% of crime unsolved

Politicians have long figured out that promising ’security’ is a great favorite with voters. So under the guide of providing security millions of cameras have been installed world wide. There is hardly any public space left in rich countries that is not filmed from several angles.

This hasn’t reduced crime - it has just increased the documentation of crime. Nothing else. Thieves are not stopped by cameras, nor are bullies or murderers. All these cameras have not even helped catching criminals -apart from speeding tickets and congestion charges for the ‘normal’ people.

Technology isn’t the way so solve social problems. More social involvement and real humans are the solution.

orangeguru (09-23 17:36) | No Comments | Permalink



copyright 2005 - 2008 for all entries dieter mueller or the respective copyright holder