Header-Logo Ultraorange.net

Etruscan Culture

historica_etruscans_head_statue

Gladiators - typical Roman? Nope, Etruscan. Aqueducts - that must be Roman? Nope, Etruscan again. Many things we would consider as typical Roman culture has been ‘invented’ by the Etruscans - a culture that long existed in the north of Italy before the Kings of Sandals arrived/prospered.

Too bad only so little remained of this great culture. I guess it was completely assimilated by the Romans after they had defeated the Etruscans?

More? Wikipedia (not much to read there) and mysteriousetruscans.com (highly recommended)

orangeguru (03-04 22:58) | No Comments | Permalink
Well done Serbian Nationalists - the World laughs at you

wa_serbian_nationalists

The Serbs have not the best reputation in Europe. The bloody deeds during the wars after the fall of Yugoslavia will be forever remembered. After NATO bombed them into submission - way too late in my personal opinion - it seemed liked the Serbs are willing to break with the past and join all the other smaller Nation as part of the European Community.

But recent protests and the reemerging ugly face of Serbian nationalism makes this very doubtful. They rather join Russia instead of the EU. And I am not sure if the EU really wants them to join anyway. At the moment the EU is pretty pissed

orangeguru (02-22 16:56) | No Comments | Permalink
The Look of old Europe

historica_old_europe_Strassburg-Altehaus

historica_old_europe_Rattenfangerhaus-Hanover

historica_old_europe_Street-Goslar

historica_old_europe_Hanover-Church

Most of the (continental) old Europe was either killed in Word War II or demolished to make way for modern car-based cities.

Even big cities like Paris, Warsaw, Hamburg, Amsterdam and Berlin had many almost medieval city centers and places. Only a few survived - most of those old building are recreations.

But maybe it’s a good thing - if you travel to Switzerland (a country so neutral it doesn’t know what war means - apart from ripping off fugitives) - everything there feels like Disney Land, because most of it’s old buildings are still there. Renewal often means destruction - and destruction of means war or a mad emperor burning down your city.

orangeguru (01-30 13:03) | 2 Comments | Permalink
Knecht Ruprecht & Krampus - a a scary old Germanic Tradition

hirstorica_krampus_nikolaus_on_bike hirstorica_krampus_nikolaus_and_child_on_back

hirstorica_krampus_and_child_on_toy_horse

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

I better let Wikipedia tell you what the Krampus and Knecht Ruprecht are all about:

The Companions of Saint Nicholas (or Father Christmas) are a group of closely related figures who accompany St. Nicholas in many European traditions. The tradition is particularly strong amongst the Germanic peoples, with some regional expression in the U.S. (largely from European ethnic groups).

The most recognized companion, especially outside of Europe, is Knecht Ruprecht, which translates as Farmhand Ruprecht or Servant Ruprecht. Other companions include Krampus (Austria, Bavaria, Croatia, Slovenia, Hungary [spelled Krampusz]), Klaubauf (Bavaria), Bartel (Styria), Pelzebock, Pelznickel, Belzeniggl, Belsnickel (Pennsylvania), Schmutzli (Switzerland), Rumpelklas, Bellzebub, Hans Muff, Drapp or Buzebergt (Augsburg), Hanstrapp (Alsace, East of France) and Le Père Fouettard (Northern France). In the Czech Republic, St. Nicholas or Svatý Mikuláš is accompanied by the Čert (Devil) and Anděl (Angel). These servants are often associated with, but are distinct from Saint Nicholas’ helpers in the Netherlands and Flanders (called Zwarte Piet, meaning Black Pete(r) in English).

Make sure to read the whole entry for loads of details.

As you can see from the last image this tradition is very much alive here in Europe and I can assure you that tonight many kids and some adults gonna crap into their pants when St. Niklaus and a wild Krampus hits their home …

orangeguru (12-06 13:28) | 4 Comments | Permalink
British Dambusters 1943

war_dambusters_6

From BBC on this Day:

The mission became popularly known as the Dambusters raid, and was immortalized in a 1954 war film. It was one of the most famous air operations of World War II. Casualties for the raid were high.

Eight of the original 19 Lancaster bombers were damaged or shot down, and of the 133 aircrew, 53 were killed and three captured. On the ground, too, almost 1,300 people were killed, including 749 Ukrainian prisoners of war based in a camp just below the Eder dam.

war_dambusters_1

The Möhne and Eder reservoirs poured about 330 million tons of water into the western Ruhr valley. The flood waters spread for about 50 miles (80km) from the source. The spectacular, daring nature of the raid was a significant boost to British morale. But militarily, it was a failure. The squadron failed to breach the Sorpe dam; and the disruption to the German war production was minimal. Water supply in the Ruhr valley was back to original levels six weeks later.

The aircrew, however, became famous as war heroes, and the leader of the raid, Wing Commander Guy Gibson, was awarded the Victoria Cross. He died less than 18 months later, shot down at the age of 26 in September 1944.

war_dambusters_5

Actually many air raids hardly stopped German war production and many raids hit only the prisoners, because they usually were unable to hide in shelters. But the loss of material and airmen for the Americans and British was incredible.

As a finale note - the Dambuster theme from the movie, which is part of the British war culture:

More? documentary about the development of the special bomb and Wikipedia entry

orangeguru (12-04 17:47) | No Comments | Permalink
The Defenders of Absolutism

wa_the_defenders_of_the_leader

I am making here a little fun of the historical concept of Absolutism.

One of the major underlying difference between so called left/liberal and right/conservative (plus fundamentalist) dogmas is the conflict between ‘relativism’ and ‘absolutism’.

In a dogma of absolutism you have ‘true’ and solid values and ‘points’ in your world view that are not negotiable. (Wikipedia on political and moral absolutism.) Some of it’s heads are: Thomas Hobbes, Immanuel Kant and Aristotle.

With a relativistic world one thing leads to another, you hardly find solid positions to navigate, but a mere set of ideas that keep a network of borders that constantly shift. (Wikipedia on moral relativism.) Some of it’s heads are: Karl Marx, Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heidegger.

Absolute concepts and values are of course easier to understand and present, since their set of rules is less wobbly - hence the word absolute.

wa_karl_marx_portrait

Karl Marx - bloody relativist communist scummmmm …

Here are some statements about Absolutism by Mr. Richard Hooker (taken again from here):

Political philosophers attempted to extricate themselves from these matters through two different, contradictory approaches: “natural law” or “the Divine Right of Kings.” According to natural law political thinkers, there were immutable natural laws which should govern states and their relations to their citizens and to other states. According to the doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, a system of thought derived ultimately from medieval theories of kingship, certain kings ruled because they were specifically chosen by God to be kings. Surprisingly, both of these approaches could yield the same result: the idea that the best form of government is an autocracy, or rule by a single person. This person was not to be questioned or disobeyed; this became known as “absolutism,” since the monarch ruled with “absolute” power, that is, unshared power.

Natural law yielded absolutism in the work of Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), who believed all things, including human society, could be understood using principles of geometry. Hobbes’ central argument was that all humans are driven by two and only two impulses: fear of death and desire for power. If left unchecked, human beings would act on these impulses and live violent, brutish, inhumane, and solitary lives. In order to keep these impulses in check, human beings, according to Hobbes, drew up a social contract, which ceded authority to a single person in exchange for a level of security. The single ruler would control the violent and selfish impulses of individual members in a society through brute force; individuals would lose their liberty, but they would gain security and community. Hobbes didn’t care what form this single rule might take, whether a monarch or a dictator, only that absolute power was required to keep society together.

wa_black_male_on_electric_chair

Relative guilty? Absolute Guilty? Relative dead? Absolute dead?

This is of course a nasty rhetoric trick from my side, to mix modern conservative thinking with an 17th century ideology. But I can’t help the feeling that the overall attitude is very similar?!

But it is about time that we leave dogmas behind us as political tools and aspire to use whatever is the best idea for the problem. But that would again imply that that solutions are relative to the problem and it’s circumstances. So is life in the end relative and not absolute? Can one defend absolute ideas in the end? Read this christian refutation of Relativism.

orangeguru (11-03 19:51) | 2 Comments | Permalink
Madrigals, Motets and all that stuff

music_choir-repertoire-musicbook

‘Old school’ European music is often still very confusing to me, especially all the different forms of choir music.

I often have a hard time figuring out the differences between a Motet (started 13th century and survived until the late 19th century), a Chanson (mostly french lyrics, started 14th century) and a Madrigal (Italian origin, mostly secular topics, started 13th century, but was mostly popular around the 16th).

So much about history. But I am still looking for same audio examples about the real differences. Any takers? So far I have found this brilliant map of early European music.

Meanwhile, click and listen to some Madrigal:

orangeguru (10-27 17:34) | No Comments | Permalink
Opera Houses

design_semperoper

Click image for a larger version.

Old European Opera houses are the pinnacle of old nationalist countries. Exquisite design for the upper class and later the emerging rich bourgeoisie. But also the different levels, boxes and seating’s reflect the societies at that time: the king / ruler gets the center of attention and most space - while the prols have to stand somewhere in the back. Design as a reflection of society …

orangeguru (10-24 16:32) | No Comments | Permalink
Holy Anger - Muslims and Europe

wa_holy_anger_0

wa_holy_anger_1

 wa_holy_anger_2 

Again and again in recent years the Muslim world exploded. Once again pride is more important then sanity. Once again people say ‘we have to respect religion’. Once again flags are burned and artists are threatened. Once again the west doesn’t ‘respect’ Islam.

I am sick and tired of this - and I guess this is also a growing feeling here in Europe from what I have read in European news and blogs.

Sure we Europeans have a long and troubled past with the middle east - because of religion and later colonialism. France and Britain have retreated from the region and the Arabs got to run their own countries. But the cold war and oil once again drew in other superpowers and foreigners. The current trouble spots Iran (read about operation Ajax) and Iraq (more about the troubled history) are a result of foreign intervention, especially by the US. It is a big historic joke that the US tries to bring democracy to a region where it’s oil interests kept totalitarian regimes in power for so long.

wa_shah__time_cover

Another great success of American foreign policy

Overall Europe continued to trade and support these tyrants and bad regimes as well. Nobody protested against Saddam as long as he was in power, nobody really cared in Europe. But we continued to allow exiles into the EU. Especially London and Paris were full of middle east exiles and rich visiting Sheiks as well. Ayatollah Khomeini planned and executed the Iranian revolution from France. Many other radical islamists went to Europe and stayed underground - because their home countries prosecuted for various reason. Over time many Muslim communities sprang up all over Europe: Turks, Kurds, Iranians, Iraqis and many more. Many of them could live here while their home countries were at war. They were allowed to run businesses, build Koran schools and mosques.

FRANCE

Riots of the underprivileged people are nothing new.

Sure there are a lot ’second class citizen’ ghettos in Spain, France, Britain and Germany. But poverty not only hits illegal immigrants, but also second generation Muslims and so called native citizens. The french riots last year showed that integration isn’t perfect, but poverty and lack of jobs is a problem for almost everyone in Europe and not just a ‘tactic’ against Muslims.

Modern Europe was always interested to see the middle east grow and get on it’s feet. Sure, there was always a certain amount of guilt, because of the colonial past. We also tried to forget about the terrible crusades and the long history of wars between Muslims and Christian Europe. Nobody here in Europe would seriously consider to recapture Jerusalem or Istanbul - instead many hope that Turkey will join the EU one day. The EU has supported many peace initiatives, supported for example the Palestinians although they blew up the Olympic Games here in Munich. Europe was always more interested in long term talks, understanding and trade. We called this soft power in contrast to hard military invention - or in current terms old European ‘weaselism’ against the new American century.

wa_holy_anger_4

European tourism to the middle east before the Age of Enlightenment

But still there is religion and huge amount of anger against Europe or any infidel in the Muslim world. It doesn’t matter if we sent help to Iran or Pakistan after earthquakes or pay for the Palestinian elections (so radical Hamas can win them in a democratic way). For the radicals and uneducated masses any reason is good enough to burn flags (never though I see a Danish flag on fire) and threaten Europe with bombs again.

The attacks in Spain and London are certainly ‘understandable’, because these countries supported the war on Iraq - which a huge amount of Europeans despised and tried to stop. But any ‘understanding’ stopped with murders like against Theo van Gogh or the bombing of tourists.

The current Holy Anger against some old cartoons from Denmark show how Europe and the Middle East have really progressed. Europe has left behind religions fanaticism and developed stable democratic societies - we are currently trying to transcend the nation state. Yes, Europe has progressed better and more since the middle ages then the Middle East.

wa_holy_anger_house_saud_lead

House of Saud - power, sand and oil - but no democracy in sight.

Yes, you can call me an European cultural snob any day - I would be proud to wear that title! I prefer the rule of law over tribal loyalty. I prefer equal rights over woman in bee keeper suits. I prefer democratic elections over Kings, Sheiks, Mullahs, Royal Families and old hereditary or religious traditions. I prefer a freedom of press and disgusting jokes over Fatwas against Artists and Newspaper Editors - or raging protests against a simple beauty contest (yep, that was in Nigeria - but still the same frame of mind). Give me a corrupt Silvio Berlusconi over a President Ahmadinejad or terror leader like Yassir Arafat.

A ‘mature’ society must be able to cope with different ideas, even insults and threats in a civilized manner. That includes any nation. Burning the Danish flag because one of it’s newspaper published a stupid cartoon is rather strange. Threatening to bomb and kill people over a stupid joke is simply daft.

wa_holy_anger_Kemal_Ataturk_hat

Kemal Atatürk showed the world that a modern country and Islam can exist side by side.

While Europeans demonstrate against wars in the Middle East and against Terrorism - the people in the Arab world seem more to protest for war and revenge - and support even terrorism. Still many Muslims dream about recreating the old Caliphate. But dreaming such dreams of old empires and conquest are out of date. Hitlers ‘Lebensraum’ idea didn’t work, neither did the communist dream of a united workers planet.

I am sure there are many people in the Middle East and Muslims who only want peace and do not support radical ideas - but it’s about time these people start to show us that they are in control and support a peaceful global society.

Muslims have to give up their conspiracy theories about Europe (and to a certain degree America) and start building their own stable societies and economies. Most of all they have to take responsibility and don’t hide behind your religion to build a better world for everyone. Once Damascus and Baghdad were on top of the world and leading centers of wisdom and enlightenment, highly tolerant and global trade powers. My dear Muslims, if you want that to happen again, then start to teach your kids, build up your economies and use your brains instead of guns and explosives.

*repost from 2006*

orangeguru (10-23 22:01) | 1 Comment | Permalink
Biometric Passports and ID’s are coming - so what?!

wa_Bundesdruckerei_biometrischer_Reisepass

Germany had the ‘pleasure’ to be the first EU country to issue biometric passports - which will be the norm for the future. Around here there are hardly any protests against this, since personal ID cards (Personalausweis) are mandatory anyway - and these have been machine readable for a long time.

I think it’s pretty silly to talk about Big Brother and total tracking - since this has been possible for a long time. First it were credit cards that allowed a pretty good tracking of your habits and financial life and now finally cell phones are even better at tracking your every movement.

Most of all - we brave consumers - give our data to companies and providers like Google more or less freely. You can’t have a ‘trackless’ life anymore.

So any Police State or Fascist regime works without much technology - it depends on the people in power. Sure technology makes it easier, but technology doesn’t automatically lead to a tyrant regime. The Romans did pretty well without computers.

More? BBC articles and reference

orangeguru (10-22 2:13) | No Comments | Permalink
Medieval Ikea?

historica_medieval_Bed

Surprisingly this very practical bed was done during Europe’s Dark Ages and it’s so very Ikea! Maybe a Viking bed?

orangeguru (10-15 16:57) | 3 Comments | Permalink
Johannes Brahms - Harfenklang

music_brahms_harfenklang_angel

Johannes Brahms is less known then other teutonic giants like Beethoven, Mozart or Bach. Still his work was highly influential and his huge body of work is a ‘Delikatesse’ for any lover of classical music.

The following piece invokes for me a blissful vision of heaven and filled with singing angels - without any Kitsch and religious overtones. Just me, myself and I - floating in clouds, gentle beings all around and eternal love in the air. I wish all religious and spiritual music would be so careful, sweet and gentle.

orangeguru (10-12 17:29) | 4 Comments | Permalink
No more Gods please!

psyche_mister_and_misses_ape

Life is harsh when you kick start the human spirit.

Humankind has spent a long time worshipping gods - since the modern Cro-magnon appeared and kicked the Neanderthal out of existence. One of the main difference between us and our ancestors is our imagination and therefore adaptability. No other ancestor started language, cave paintings or complex cultures.

But our imagination is also our greatest enemy. Where we lacked knowledge we invented ‘things’ to fill the gaps. So in shock and awe about nature we invented spirits, ghosts and gods to explain thunder, death and a lot of other annoying things.

psyche_cave_painting_ox_horse

Me Artist! Me Paint! Me Talk to Horsy Spirit! Me Shaman! Bow to me!

As our mental capabilities expanded so did our cultures, language and religions. If you look at the history of religions you also see how their concepts and liturgy evolved in complexity. But the human intellect is an amazing thing - and once our basic civilization was established smarter heads started to questions the gods themselves (like Epicurus).

They already concluded that nature is everything and that the gods are nothing. Even things like the atom were discussed long before they had the means to research it’s existence. Human imagination can work far beyond your cultural and technological limits.

But religion also proved to be a great tool over power - and rulers always like to have a divine backing. The people can ruled much easier if their leaders are in favor with the gods - not matter how dubious those connections are. And almost all cultures have creations myths that make THEM the chosen ones. For example the Japanese track themselves back to the sun goddess Amaterasu. I personally like the imagination and complexity of Hinduism. You hardly find a more colorful universe of gods.

psyche_durga_attacking

The Enemies of my Religion are also our Enemies. Let’s crush them, because we are the Chosen ones …

As religion is an attempt to explain the universe (and therefore a search for the ultimate truth) it leads to science. Almost all early European scientist were dedicated Christians, who were VERY curious how god managed to run the whole show. Too bad that they discovered that the old stories of all religions weren’t true: the earth was neither the center of the universe nor was it formed out of a slain giants body.

But parallel to the myths of religion (and fairy tales) we humans discovered spirituality, our own psyche, the secrets of our minds and a new love for the beauty of the universe. Almost all major religions have their smaller departments dedicated to more serious spiritual paths - which are often more demanding and more abstract then the normal liturgy for the common follower. A truely dedicated lifestyle of a Yogi or Jesuit priest is NOT everyone - it’s very demanding. And people are unwilling to really give everything for their gods. Self preservation is usually stronger then religion.

psyche_yogi_tea_party

Are you a true follower of your God(s)?! Spiritual nakedness and Yogi tea are not for everybody you know …?!

Life - the last twenty thousand years - was quite harsh to humans. Simply getting enough food was tough enough. Life was always very unfair and scary. Religion also helped to cope with fear and survival - tight rules and rituals helped tribes to survive and unite under a common banner/purpose. Religion also helped us to ‘organize’ power and hierarchies.

Religion helped us to survive and was one of the first components of our cultures. But culture will continue to evolve - even the evolution of ideas is pretty unstoppable.

Many people say that science is the true enemy of the gods or any religion. But no - our cultural evolution is the true ‘enemy’ (if you can speak in such terms anyway).

Cultural evolution brings not only full stomachs, but a separation of powers, the rule of the law, a more mutual sharing of technologies, education, medical supplies and science.

In the early 1500s European Christianity was becoming more and more aware of those ‘other’ religions and world views - simply because travel and trade was coming back to roman standards. In a monotheistic religion/society it’s much more shocking to hear that there is an alternative to just the one ‘true’ god. Polytheistic societies never had that problem to such an extend - they could cope with (just) another god …

psyche_The_Muezzins_call_to_prayer

The same Country and same God - three different groups fighting to the Death. A bit odd isn’t it?!

Luxuries like human rights, democracy, free markets and the separation of powers didn’t appear until the late 1700s in Europe. Instead of just fighting for survival, we could dedicate (again) more resources to social evolution and exploration, because we finally had the understanding how to help ourselves and survive.

Also we started to rule ourselves less by divine appointment, but by social and political ideas. The concept of the national identity was supplanting religious identities - especially in Europe after those devastating and fruitless religious wars.

So in some way Martin Luther’s idea split the Christian atom (much more then the catholic (western) and orthodox (eastern) separation before). This big bang lead to the Age of Enlightenment. But it was paid with a lot of blood and burned bodies.

psyche_Martin_Luther_portrait

He challenged the Power of the Church and tried to put believe back into Christianity.

Looking back in our history one could say we have fought many wars between conflicting cultural ideas: from tribes uniting under one religion, to great religions fighting each other and social ideas fighting religions to establish a new order within a bigger cultural context.

Overall our cultures evolved to ever increasing social structures: from tribes to kingdoms, from kingdoms to nation states, from nation states to continental entities (like the EU).

But old ideas never completely die: we still have tribalism as well as religion amongst us. The wars of the 1990’s in the Balkans and current conflicts between Muslims and Christians show how deep these old ideas are still embedded in our cultural DNA.

psyche_american_founding_fathers

The Founding Fathers of America - one of the greatest moments in History. They put the Nation before God, the Citizen before their Rulers.

The idea of the nation state or even atheism are pretty new - hardly a couple of centuries old - compared to tens of thousands of years of tribalism and religions.

I say no more gods please - they had several thousand years to enlighten us, put an end to suffering, spread universal love and understanding. Gods and religions have failed to do so - although they had more then enough time and cost us a huge amount of life’s.

We are currently struggling to implement new concepts into our cultural evolution: a truly global society, universal human rights, total religious freedom (or betters say to protect ‘true’ believers from each other) and a free flow of information. No surprise people are scared and more blood is shed. But overall our current democratic, socialist and capitalist ‘ideas’ have feed and clothed more people then ever - safety and education are still on the rise although we still experience huge humanitarian catastrophes (like in Darfur or Africa in general).

Since democracy, technology and science have started to spread - we as a race have prospered more then ever. Gods didn’t build schools and hospitals, fed and clothed the poor, educated and explored the human potential - and this potential also includes our spirituality and imagination.

*repost from 2005*

orangeguru (10-08 17:36) | 4 Comments | Permalink
A funny thing happened on the Way to Democracy

historica_ballot-box

Every time I hear a modern politician emphasize the need to democratize the backwards nations on this planet I want to applaud and punch them in the face at the same time. This also applies to many political commentators and of course Bloggers, who love to pounce undemocratic countries and make them switch to the best political system invented yet by sheer willpower.

Although I am a staunch supporter of Democracy, I don’t believe in it as an instant solution to most countries problems. Democracy is an indicator for a modern and developed nation - but Democracy itself doesn’t transform backwards societies into shiny new ones.

Europe has not only invented many forms of government - but also tried and tested many of them. It’s a rich tradition paid for with many life’s and often centuries of terrible consequences. Most of all it took Europe nearly two thousand long years to transform itself into these shining beacons of enlightenment and peace as we know it today.

historica_Stoa_of_Attalos

Aristotle’s Politics at work in Greece.

But the History of Democracy itself is a funny and ugly affair - with a huge whole between it’s beginning and final modern success.

Although it was so famously invented by the Greek nation states (most notably Athens) around 500 BC. But it was not the form of democracy we hold so dear today: woman, slaves and bloody foreigners were excluded from the process and of course regarded as second class citizens. Most important of all is that Demokratia was in the beginning successfully exported to some other nation states, but pretty fast abolished through other forms of government. Here is another good background article on Greek Democracy.

A similar development happened to the Roman Republic - which freed itself from it’s kings around the same time as the Greeks discussed in public meetings. The Roman Republic also had many elements of a modern state: a senate with lively debates, a citizenship, rule of law, votes and elected officials.

Greece lost it’s independence to the Romans around 150 BC - Rome itself turned slowly into a dictatorship after many bloody civil wars and chaotic rule by the Senate. This transformation found it’s great dictator with Julius Ceasar.

historica_early_senate

A republican Senate is boring - lets get ourselves a proper Dictator

Now comes the funny thing - since the end of the Greece and roman experiments not much was heard or seen of Democracy in Europe. Some tribal societies had smaller democratic elections or forms of community (like the Althing in Iceland - established 930 or the polish Veche), but no big democratic state or system emerged for a long time.

Also the idea of Democracy was more or less forgotten by European thinkers and statesmen. The medieval mind was more occupied with symbolism and religion then democracy or equal rights for everyone. Now it was time for feudalism and religion to bring blood, tears and ignorance. The common men lost any chance in participating in ‘big government’.

For almost 1500 years until the Renaissance nobody had any real interest in old Greek ideas and values. Rich merchants, the clergy and feudal ruler continued to suppress peasants and workers. Even the Reformation didn’t change much about this. Martin Luther supported the ruling class during several peasant uprisings. It was not yet time for social equality nor democratic rights for everyone.

historica_oliver_cromwell

May I have your head your Majesty?

But all was not lost - especially in England. The first Parliament (later split up into the House of Commons and House of Lords) was formed during the reign of King Henry III in the 13th century. Still not mass democracy, but a start to sharing powers and establishing the modern rule of law.

It was still a feudal affair, a political class system instead of a system of democratic equals. And still the Crown ruled supreme. It was a long and bitter process over many centuries and civil wars to change this.

Almost 500 years later Oliver Cromwell made the Parliament a permanent establishment instead of a ’seasonal affair’ created and disbanded by the Crown at will. Now the people reigned supreme instead of the Monarchy - but it took two bloody civil wars to cut of the monarch’s head (1649) and establish the Parliamentary System in England.

historica_american_declaration_independence

What say ye old wooden tooth?

The biggest step for European Democracy happened in … America and their fight for Independence from the British Empire (1775 - 1783). The American Revolution started with the impressive Declaration of Independence in the year 1776.

This great document was the ‘result’ of the European ‘Age of Enlightenment’ - a political, artistic and philosophical movement that created the mental cornerstones of our modern societies with it’s humanism, socialism, secular and democratic systems. But it was the achievement of young American society to build the first nation based on these ideas. It was much harder to transform the old and encrusted European societies - but it happened eventually.

Now we have to applaud the french people who finally got it right and started their first revolution of 1789, which lead finally to the Abolition of Feudalism.

historica_house_of_commons_1851

The modern House of Commons from 1851.

It still took almost two hundred more years since Cromwell till Democracy was more firmly established in the UK by the Reform Act of 1867, which allowed more ‘normal’ men to vote instead of the privileged gentry and it also abolished so called rotten boroughs. Still no women were allowed to vote.

The real reason for the breakthrough of modern western Democracy was the Industrial Revolution. With the emergence of the working and middle class the old class system was finally abolished and replaced by new modern movements. Socialism, Feminism and Communism were triggered by the social consequences of the Industrial Revolution.

historica_factory-workers

Say hello to a new political power - the industrial working class.

The miserable living and working conditions of workers in slums, child labor and the slow organization of Labor created the pressure for huge changes, like medical care, housing projects, education, equal rights and the vote for everyone. The new economy broke down many social barriers and also allowed a new upward mobility.

And finally the suffragette movement - started in the early 1800’s - established the right to vote for woman (1920 in the US and 1928 in the UK). Once again a slow process that took almost another hundred years to be globally accepted.

The new ‘mass societies’ also demanded better forms of representation and government - as well as accountability and social justice. The shock of the Soviet October Revolution finally convinced even the most hardened elites in Europe that mass democracy was the best way to go for the future.

historica_nazi_workers_rally

Democracies have to be protected against the enemy from within

But modern Democracy faced two final test before it got the global stamp of approval: it had to fight to defend it’s values against Fascism and Communism before it was accepted as the best form of government. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Moussolini and Franco transformed their nations by popular support into terrible societies.

So it was a long and bloody road from the first forms of Democracy until our modern mass Democracies. To establish itself Democracy needs first the rule of law and a broad industrial society with a rule of law and separation of powers.

Without economic support to pay for education, medical care and a national infrastructure it won’t work. You also need a big and strong middle class and educated elites to develop a political landscape, start parties, run ministries, the judiciary system, an independent media, ‘neutral’ police and armed forces. Too many Democracies fell victim to military interventions ‘to save the country’.

historica_we_elect_allah

We elect Allah as our Leader.

Equally important is a strong secular humanism within the society itself - the separation of Church and State. It took Europe centuries of war and millions of deaths to learn that lesson.

Many African or middle eastern countries lack many components I just mentioned and you can’t for example develop a strong economical base over night or an educated middle class to form a strong political landscape. The same is also still true for a few Asian countries, but they have picked up the basics much faster then many of their African and Arabic counterparts.

orangeguru (10-01 11:21) | No Comments | Permalink
Discover the Muslim Heritage of our World

historica_muslim_world_exhibition

Click here to visit this great online exhibition. Europe almost didn’t survive it’s early Christian seclusion. Most knowledge of the romans and Greeks had been lost, science and exploration grinded to a total stop. Good thing that the Muslims / Arabs kept the Light of Knowledge burning. Europe had to re-import all that old knowledge via trade with the Muslims with Italy or Spain. This restarted the European spirit - the Renaissance heralded a new era.

So enjoy and explore this interesting exhibition that shows how advanced the Arab / Muslim world was. Too bad they also had their falldown and still haven’t recovered the cultural and scientific greatness they once had.

orangeguru (10-01 10:51) | No Comments | Permalink
Johann Sebastian Bach - a giant amongst composers

music_Hausman-Johann Sebastian Bach

Since Leonardo requested a posting about the great Bach I have tried to wrap my tiny mind around the Genius of this Giant. To be honest: I think you have to be a composer, a philosopher, a musician and a mathematician to really really really appreciate the depth of this Maestro. And he created a massive amount of ‘notes’. To know Bach means to spent days and weeks listening to a huge amount of music.

He is part of a great period of Germanic enlightenment: Mozart, Beethoven, Schumann and Mendelssohn - and many more. It was a time of restless Teutonic renewal and overall change in Europe (Age of Enlightenment). The period that laid the foundation for modern day democratic and humanitarian Europe. But it was also an age of wild romantic compassion and insight.

Cantata BWV 208 - Was mir behagt, ist nur die muntre Jagd!

You can feel still some old medieval Europe in Bach’s music - the devout churchgoing citizens. But these citizens are different, because they are slowly grabbing power from the old institutions like Holy-Mother Church and blue blooded Aristocracy.

Toccata And Fugue In D Minor For Organ BWV 565

Bach’s music is often very ‘churchy’ - but you can also find many intimate and passionate pieces that rival Beethoven’s later achievements in spirit and emotion.

Many of Beethoven’s compositions were deemed too erotic and too emotional in their days. But you already can hear that intimacy in Bach’s music - albeit not as explosive as "Freude schöner Götterfunken!".

Suite No. 1 For Solo-Cello In G-Major

More? Wikipedia and the Bach.org website.

PS: Leonardo - sorry, that’s all I can write from a personal perspective. I am simply not genius enough to drill through this Mountain. ;-)

PPS: Anyone else out there with some more personal insights on Bach?

orangeguru (09-28 18:09) | 3 Comments | Permalink
I want those Jews back!

historica_old_jews_in_park

Obviously there is hardly any Jewish culture left in Germany. Most of it is tucked away and hidden. Plus the old guilt complex makes any ‘normal’ exchange painful.

German Jews were always an important aspect of my country - until that maniac came along. The brain drain thanks to the holocaust as well as immigration was incredible. The intelligentsia, as well as artists and academic sector was depleted of thousands of important people.

We badly need that Jewish humor and wits back - plus a normalized relationship again, like in pre-war Germany before 1933.

orangeguru (09-28 17:10) | 2 Comments | Permalink
Europe’s almost death

historica_knights_at_war

Until the late 12th century almost any cultural life or innovation had died in Europe. Christian mysticism and symbolism had completely taken over all the great minds. Thanks to the Arabs and many wars we started to exchange ideas again and rediscover lost authors and wisdom of Greek and Roman origin.

Not only animals, but also culture, art and science can be completely eradicated. Beware of religious fundamentalism, it won’t tolerate any knowledge beside itself and keep it’s followers dumb.

orangeguru (09-25 15:05) | No Comments | Permalink
Those bad European Muslims

wa_muslim_astronomers

There are several American ’security experts’ and weirdos who say, that Europe is the real threat to American security - because it is the perfect breeding ground for terrorists.

The shoe bomber was a British national - right! The killer of the Dutch director van Gogh was also born in the Netherlands - right! Didn’t Germany harbor a cell of 9/11 terrorists - right?!

According to some sources somewhere between two to seven million Muslims live in the US - while Europe has around twelve to twenty million.

First of all they are not just ‘one kind of people’. Germany is host to many Turks, while Britain has people from many Arab nations as well as Asian Muslims. France and Spain are of course closer to African Muslims, because of their history (remember Spain was once conquered by Muslims). They sure are all Muslims, but they share very different backgrounds and languages. Just as many white Europeans are Christians - but hardly all follow the catholic church.

wa_chillingworth_protestants

These bloody protestants - all terrorists! Burn them all! We need to protect our communities!

Many Muslims are living at the fringes of normal European societies, which is normal for most immigrants that have no local family connections, no money and hardly any education in modern jobs. There is obviously the language barrier and some xenophobia as well. But even ‘native’ Muslims in their third or even fourth generation live at the fringes. Why? Because many of these cultures simply stay within their own ghettos. We have Turks here in Germany who lived here for thirty years, but hardly speak German, know teutonic culture or have even contact to any Germans. They stay in their little Istanbuls and prefer it that way. The same is true for many communities in France, Britain, Netherlands etc.

But makes such a strong and rather stubborn refusal against integration everyone a terrorist? Of course not.

wa_terrorists_or_not

Uhhh, scary Muslims …

First of all we simply can’t and won’t control these 20 million people. We Germans already tried that method - it was called Konzentrationslager. Yes, immigration is a problem here, but it is not a flood of Muslim hordes sweeping Europe.

Of course we have also problems with terrorists here - but which one do you mean? IRA? ETA? Red Brigades? PKK? Or even Neo-Nazis? Al Qaeda is simply the newest member of a very annoying club. And once again we refuse to let them dictate our life’s and civil liberties. And there is no protection against them: even Muslim countries get bombed by Muslim terrorists. Plus no law or a gazillion policemen will guarantee absolute security. That is an illusion.

wa_suicide_bomber_kid

No headscarfs and bombs allowed in European schools

So yes, we Europeans want these Muslims, even though we still stay strangers to each other and still have to learn a lot on both sides to live with each other.

If America feels threatened by foreigners, then it should remember it’s old isolationist’s traditions and maybe shutdown it’s borders - Japan did this for several hundred years more or less successful.

orangeguru (09-22 12:57) | No Comments | Permalink
Harpsichord vs Piano

music_harpsichord

I consider the Harpsichord an ‘unevolved’ Piano (see also an Wikientry about it’s History). Until the year 1700 the Harpsichord it ruled supreme - until the Italian Bartolomeo Cristofori finally invented the Piano.

Just in time for such Giants like Mozart and Beethoven.

To my ears the Harpsichord sounds very flat und without passion. I can’t hear more then three pieces of Harpsichord music until I need a change. Very different to good Piano music …

Listen for yourself - Harpsichord: 

In contrast a Piano piece:

orangeguru (09-21 14:16) | No Comments | Permalink
Gottfried Piefke - Preußens Gloria

music_preussens_gloria

Military marches are a strange breed of music. Pompous, patriotic and mostly idiotic.

Preußens Gloria is the most famous German soundtrack for war. It has been used and abused for almost anything.

I think Glen Miller did the American troops and all soldiers a great service when he played his own compositions instead of the traditional crap - while those poor souls marched to their deaths.

orangeguru (09-17 10:19) | 1 Comment | Permalink
Did they already forget early capitalism?

historica_worker_housing_manchester_19th_century

Most people in rich countries seem to have forgotten the terrible days of early capitalism and industrialization? Worker stuffed into small houses or special workers areas in overcrowded cities. Terrible pollution damages humans and nature alike. Many must work hard and in backbreaking conditions, so others can get cheap goods and services. There are not insurances against work accidents or any healthcare packages. Industrial giants do what they want, since the government depends of their money.

That’s just like what is happening in China and India again. But workers rights and our modern social achievements are under attack in rich countries as well.

orangeguru (09-13 8:52) | No Comments | Permalink
Canti Gregoriani - Kyrie Christe Eleison

music_Kyrie

European classical music is great - when you ignore about a thousand years of religious singsang. Literally for centuries composers were obliged to repeat the same topics over and over again: kyrie eleison (Greek for ‘Lord have mercy’) etc.

Musical freedom and the development of more complex music came AFTER the catholic church had lost it’s stranglehold on ‘popular culture of the middle ages’. Actually the protestant revolution actually helped a lot to trigger that change.

Today when we hear real and fake Gregorian Monks chant it - it sooths our hectic souls. The new age movement has totally swallowed that old Christian groove. There are even pop versions of it - the group ‘Enigma’ has made a very healthy living from it.

But overall have you heard one Kyrie Eleison you heard them all.

More? Kyrie @ Wikipedia

orangeguru (09-10 8:43) | No Comments | Permalink
Where are the Clowns and Jesters?

historica_roberto_clown

“A clown is like aspirin, only he works twice as fast.”
Groucho Marx

It is sad that the old traditions of Clowns and Jesters. Modern - so called Comedians - often have less stage skills and social involvement like the old timers did (and sometimes still do). Humor as integral part of human society. connected to everything ranging from health to high politics has become more of a business instead of a ’shared good’ and challenge for all (like during the times of Fasching).

The goal today is to entertain, not to educate. Political satire, philosophy, social education and health concerns have mostly vanished from the agenda of modern comedians.

orangeguru (09-10 8:14) | 3 Comments | Permalink
Castrati Singers - sacrifice your Balls for Art

historica_Castrati

I think art is important and some sacrifices have to be made to achieve great works of it. But not my balls! Castrati singers have been all the rage in 17th to 18th century Italy - and thousands were castrated to reach that special high note. Ouch!

Here is an excellent BBC article on the subject which also includes a link to a small audio file of a Castrati singing. The only recording that exists!

More? Castrati @ Wikipedia

orangeguru (09-09 22:14) | No Comments | Permalink



copyright 2005 - 2008 for all entries dieter mueller or the respective copyright holder